People often ask me, if the dream is indeterminate from the outset,
and the dreamer's responses co-create the dream as it unfolds, what do
we make of the imagery? If it is, as I've said elsewhere, a "mutable
interface" between the dreamer and the emergent novelty of the dream, or
a "moment-to-moment vectoring" of the dreamer-dream relationship, how
do we analyze it for its meaning? I am working on a paper about this
very question, but I want to say a few things that might help you in
analyzing imagery from this perspective.
Instead of
asking, "What does this image mean?" which implies that the image is
fixed, and has a fixed meaning, you might ask, "How does this image
change in the course of the dream?" and "How does the imagery's changes
reflect the dreamer's changes in belief, attitude or response?" Through
such questioning, you can assist the dreamer in understanding how the reciprocal relationship
between dreamer and dream content is a growing, or regressing
process--that the dreamer is either moving toward integration of some
issue, or moving away from it. Also, when you focus on imagery changes,
you end up analyzing two or more discrete images that, while different,
may fit within a broad class of images. Take for instance a dream of a
48-year-old woman that I worked with yesterday. Without telling you the
whole dream, consider the fact that she started by driving a car, then
was on foot and nearly run over by a tractor trailer, then was in a
hotel awaiting the departure of a sea cruise on an ocean liner. When she
reflected on the change of imagery, she was able to see that the car,
the tractor trailer and ocean liner were all ways to get somewhere, all
means of transportation--and that they were moving from smaller to
larger, and from smaller capacity to greater capacity. She also
reflected on how the movement reflected a letting go and depending on
others. Her willingness to shift from an individualistic to a relational
agenda was reflected in the shift of imagery from car to ocean liner.
Significantly, while she was largely alone at the beginning of the
dream, or with people who did not seem to have any direction or agenda,
she was with her boyfriend at the end, waiting for their ship to come
in.
Focusing on how images change will naturally guide the conversation toward classes of images
and away from specificity. This helps the dreamer see that a series of
outwardly disparate images can actually refer to a general life issue
rather than to one specific situation. Those of you familiar with
various hierarchical systems of life domains, such as the Eastern
concept of chakras, or Maslow's hieracrchy of needs, will find
that this shift from specific to general imagery will help the dreamer
understand that a dream may reflect a struggle /and or a resolution of a
basic problem related to survival, affiliation, power, service, or any
of the other main dimensions of life that have been defined in such
comprehensive systems. This may seem overly complicated, but in actual
practice it comes across as a natural, client-centered form of inquiry.
To show you how imagery change analysis fits comfortably into
co-creative dream practice, I will be posting a video of working with
the woman and the dream that I have mentioned here.
Where I write about dream theory and analysis, lucid dreams and out-of-body experiences, spiritual practice, spiritual experiences, and transpersonal psychotherapy topics.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The Disappearing Client I often reflect on the strangeness of serving as a psychotherapist. It's hard to know the impact of my work, bec...
-
10/2/13 For over a year now, I have been using galantamine––an extract of the snow drop lily––along with meditation as a catalyst for luc...
-
I stopped writing about my lucid dreams/OOBE's last fall, mainly because real life became so demanding that my nighttime practice fell o...
-
If you’ve read some of my papers about the FiveStar Method, you’d know that my focus in working with your dreams is primarily on the dreamer...
No comments:
Post a Comment